LICENSING, TRADE, AND ENFORCEMENT: EVALUATING THE LEGAL REGIME GOVERNING THE ARMS AND WEAPON INDUSTRY IN INDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55829/fksdbb38Keywords:
Arms Act, 1959, Arms Rules, 2016, Weapons and Ammunition, Licensing, Enforcement, National Security.Abstract
India's dedication to striking a balance between public safety, national security, and economic development is reflected in the complex and dynamic regulatory structure that oversees the country's arms and weapons industry. The current framework, which has its roots in colonial-era controls and was substantially altered after independence by the Arms Act of 1959 and the Arms Rules of 2016, has grown to include licensing, trade regulation, and enforcement at the federal and state levels. Nevertheless, the industry still faces difficulties like monopolistic market tactics, the spread of illegal weapons, regulatory oversight gaps, and bureaucratic bottlenecks. In addition to evaluating the constitutional underpinnings, international commitments, and administrative obstacles, this study aims to critically analyses the effectiveness of India's legislative and procedural frameworks controlling the licensing, production, trade, and enforcement of weapons. The study identifies both systemic flaws and positives in the current regulatory framework by using a doctrinal research technique based on secondary sources, such as government reports, statutory texts, court decisions, and international agreements. The results show that even while the legal framework is broad, administrative hold-ups, a lack of technology modernization, and disjointed interagency collaboration cause its enforcement to be uneven. The study comes to the conclusion that in order to improve transparency, encourage indigenization, encourage responsible arms exports, and guarantee strong adherence to international standards, significant reform is necessary. By providing practical legal and policy proposals targeted at improving institutional capacity, expediting licensing procedures, and bolstering India's standing as a safe and responsible participant in the international arms trade, it adds to the conversation on strategic autonomy.
References
[1] Girish, V., & Jagawanshi, P. (2021). An Analysis of Indian Arms Laws with Respect to Licensing Procedures. Issue 5 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 4, 1073.
[2] Brauer, J. (2007). Arms industries, arms trade, and developing countries. Handbook of defense economics, 2, 973-1015.
[3] Nayan, R., & Nayan, R. (2019). Indian Legal Framework for Strategic Trade Management. Global Strategic Trade Management: How India Adjusts its Export Control System for Accommodation in the Global System, 89-110.
[4] Malhotra, A. (2011). Globalization and the Illicit Trade of Small Arms and Light Weapons”. Eurasia Review.
[5] Singh, B. (1989). Asean's arms industries: potential and limits. Comparative strategy, 8(2), 249-264.
[6] Efrat, A. (2010). Toward internationally regulated goods: controlling the trade in small arms and light weapons. International Organization, 64(1), 97-131.
[7] Hartley, K. (2007). The arms industry, procurement and industrial policies. Handbook of defense economics, 2, 1139-1176.
[8] Rossiter, A., & Cannon, B. J. (2019). Making arms in India? Examining New Delhi’s renewed drive for defence-industrial indigenization. Defence Studies, 19(4), 353-372.
[9] Mistry, D. (2003). Containing missile proliferation: Strategic technology, security regimes, and international cooperation in arms control. University of Washington Press.
[10] Gupta, A. (1990). The Indian arms industry: a lumbering giant?. Asian Survey, 30(9), 846-861.
[11] Garcia-Alonso, M. D., & Levine, P. (2007). Arms trade and arms races: A strategic analysis. Handbook of defense economics, 2, 941-971.
[12] Beck, M. D., Cupitt, R. T., Jones, S. A., & Galhaut, S. (2003). To Supply or to Deny: Comparing Nonproliferation Export Controls in Five Key Countries. Kluwer Law International BV.
[13] Bitzinger, R. A. (1994). The globalization of the arms industry: The next proliferation challenge. International Security, 19(2), 170-198.
[14] Kerr, P. K., & Hildreth, S. A. (2010). Proliferation control regimes: background and status. Congressional Research Service.
[15] Grant, J. A. (2007). Rulers, guns, and money: the global arms trade in the age of imperialism. Harvard University Press.
[16] Li, B., & Zhao, H. (2010). Governmental Regulations on Commercial Aspects of China's Space Activities. Indian J. Int'l Econ. L., 3, 28.
[17] Bourne, M. (2005). The proliferation of small arms and light weapons. In New threats and new actors in international security (pp. 155-176). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
[18] Park, S., & Thakkar, C. (2024). Filling the weapons procurement gap in the Indo-Pacific: South Korean arms exports to India and Indonesia. Contemporary Security Policy, 1-28.
[19] Kumar, S. (2008). Small Arms and Light Weapons: A Global Threat to Human Security and Development. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 787-800.
[20] Brauer, J. (2002). The arms industry in developing nations: history and post-cold war assessment. In Arming the South: The Economics of Military Expenditure, Arms Production and Arms Trade in Developing Countries (pp. 101-127). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[21] Devore, M. R. (2013). Arms production in the global village: options for adapting to defense-industrial globalization. Security studies, 22(3), 532-572.
[22] Ohlson, T., & Brzoska, M. (2020). The trade in major conventional weapons. In The Arms Race and Arms Control 1984 (pp. 90-125). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Management, Public Policy and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
