An Econometric Disquisition on the Differential Occupational Market Valuation of Digitally-Enabled Micro-Credentials vis-à-vis Conventional Academe-Derived Degrees: A Pecuniary Recompense Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55829/xxv1wr32Keywords:
Digital pedagogy, Online education, Credentialing paradigms, Labor market signaling, Human capital, Credential inflationAbstract
The inexorable ascendancy of digital pedagogical modalities within the post-secondary educational ecosystem has engendered a tectonic shift in credentialing paradigms, concomitantly provoking a profound scholarly interrogation of the attendant economic externalities. This study rigorously explores the multifaceted macroeconomic and microeconomic reverberations emanating from the dialectical interplay between emergent online certifications and conventional academic degrees. Employing a rigorous mixed-methodological framework that synergistically amalgamates advanced econometric analyses with a robust qualitative meta-synthesis, the research elucidates the differential labor market signaling potency, human capital valuation, and income stratification effects precipitated by credential heterogeneity and inflation. Utilizing comprehensive, longitudinal datasets from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics, and the LinkedIn Economic Graph, this inquiry delineates nuanced labor market dynamics, wage dispersion patterns, and institutional economic viability underpinned by credential diversification. Findings evince that while online credentials ostensibly democratize educational access and facilitate labor market agility, they concurrently exacerbate wage polarization and occupational segmentation, thereby necessitating nuanced policy interventions that reconcile innovation diffusion with socioeconomic equity imperatives.
References
[1] Arrow, K. J. (1973). Higher education as a filter. Journal of Public Economics, 2(3), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(73)90061-8
[2] Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553-1597. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.5.1553
[3] Babson Survey Research Group. (2022). Online learning in the United States: 2022. Babson Survey Research Group. https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/2022
[4] Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
[5] Bessen, J. E. (2019). AI and jobs: The role of demand. NBER Working Paper No. 24235. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24235
[6] Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
[7] Brown, P., & Hesketh, A. (2004). The mismanagement of talent: Employability and jobs in the knowledge economy. Oxford University Press.
[8] Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1801-1863). Elsevier.
[9] Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Strohl, J. (2021). Recovery: Job growth and education requirements through 2030. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
[10] Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K–12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction to the theory of hybrids. Clayton Christensen Institute.
[11] Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. Academic Press.
[12] Deming, D. J., & Noray, K. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965-2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa013
[13] Dynarski, S. (2016). The trouble with student loans? Low earnings, not high debt. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-trouble-with-student-loans-low-earnings-not-high-debt/
[14] Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press.
[15] Jain, P., & Sharma, A. (2021). Economic returns of online certifications: A sectoral analysis. Journal of Education Economics, 34(2), 101-118.
[16] Jaschik, S. (2020). Employers weigh in on online credentials. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/09/10/employers-weigh-online-credentials
[17] Mitchell, J., Leachman, M., & Saenz, M. (2021). Online credentials and labor market outcomes: A systematic review. Education Finance and Policy, 16(3), 488-520.
[18] National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2023). Postsecondary education data system. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/
[19] Oreopoulos, P., & Petronijevic, U. (2013). Making college worth it: A review of research on the returns to higher education. The Future of Children, 23(1), 41-65.
[20] Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science, 363(6423), 130-131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958
[21] Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
[22] Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
[23] Statista. (2024). Number of Coursera users worldwide from 2016 to 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/881255/coursera-global-users/
[24] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2023). Earnings and unemployment rates by educational attainment. https://www.bls.gov/emp/chart-unemployment-earnings-education.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Management, Public Policy and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
